Thursday, July 31, 2025

British Monarch Profession of Protestant Faith before Parliament in Contrast to US Constituion

 

 


Did you realize that the words “So help me God”, spoken by Presidents as they take the required oath or affirmation of office, are not required to be spoken, nor are they even present in the Constitution?

I acknowledge that most, if not all Presidents, have spoken those words. But they have done so as a point of personal choice, not requirement.

I present the Constitutional requirement here:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

These words are found in Article 2, section 1, last paragraph.

The link to the full transcript of the Constitution is provided at the bottom of this post.

I offer that bit of information merely as an appetizer of the Constitution before I move on to the very tasty entre which follows.

Queen Elizabeth II, addressing Parliament for the first time, November 4, 1952, began with the following paragraph…

"I, Elizabeth, do solemnly and sincerely in the presence of God profess, testify, and declare that I am a faithful Protestant, and that I will, according to the true intent of the enactments which secure the Protestant succession to the Throne, uphold and maintain the said enactments to the best of my powers according to law."

This was not merely a point of personal choice for her. This profession, testimony, and declaration was necessary for her as she claimed the Throne.

There was at that time, and I believe still exists, the Act of Settlement and Protestant Succession, which was passed by Parliament in 1701. It requires the Monarch t be a member of the Church of England and to declare an oath to the Protestant faith.

Contrarily, here in the United States, there is no requirement that a person holding office of any level declare any religious faith.

In fact, Article VI, last paragraph concludes with the following provision…

“but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

It may be true that most people who lived in the United States at the time of the ratification of the Constitution were Christians of some stripe or another. I know that there were also Unitarians and Deists.

But this information regarding the Protestant Succession Act, which I am sure those educated framers of our government were aware of, tells us that if the framers had wanted to establish a Christian form of government, they had precedent and example to do so.

Yet they chose to go to great lengths to avoid establishing a religious government.

The Preamble of the Constitution has no religious language.

The 1st Amendment provides that there shall be no establishment of religion by the government.

There is the aforementioned “no religious test” clause.

There are no stated prohibitions of religion, which they could, had they chosen, to include.

In stark and resolute contrast to the Protestant Succession Act of Parliament, 1701, The Constitution of the United States respects your conscience as being inviolate.

It is an exceptional trait provided to and by us. May it never be surrendered.

 

 

U S Constitution: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript

 

Queen Elizabeth II speech: https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1952/nov/04/the-queens-speech

 

Act of Settlement and Protestant Succession: https://archive.org/details/sn-00683-Parliamant/mode/2up